I woke up this morning determined to write a post about how angry I am over the media's dissing of Hillary. Her big win Tuesday in West Virgina means nothing as all the pundits have already voted her off the island. Then comes John Edward's endorsement of Obama in spite of the fact that Hillary has continued his campaign highlighting the poverty that embraces so much of this country and what needs to be done. But the icing on the cake, so to speak, was NARAL's endorsement of Obama. NARAL's endorsement is a huge insult to Hillary, someone who has tirelessly worked for reproductive rights. While Obama may support these rights, Hillary has rolled up her sleeves and worked for them. NARAL could not have waited until HIllary drops out of the race to make their endorsement?
Continue reading "No Girls Allowed" »
One argument that has been advanced for electing Barack Obama to be president instead of Hillary Clinton is that Obama would be so much more popular in the Muslim world. Afterall, Obama's father was Muslim, right? (Nevermind that he turned into a nonbeliever later on.)
That argument sounded resonable to me until I read Edward N. Luttwak's op ed in the New York Times today. As Luttwak points out, Obama was born to a Muslim father, which under Muslim law made him a Muslim. But, here's the bad part: Later on in life, Obama became a Christian, which under Muslim law makes him an apostate.
Continue reading "Oh, oh, trouble. Obama's an apostate." »
In the Indiana and North Carolina Democratic primary races, white males went to the polls in droves to vote for, guess who. Hillary, the female candidate. This was a shocker for many who assumed that those type voters wouldn't give Hillary the time of day.
The pundits have decided that the only explanation for this strange phenomenon is that white men hate blacks more than they hate women. Well, hold your horses, Chris Matthews and Tim Russert. Susan Faludi has another explanation.
Continue reading "Susan Faludi Gets It: Hillary's a Contender" »

“For the supposed crimes of
heresy and witchcraft, hundreds of women endured such persecutions and
tortures that the most stolid historians are said to have wept in recording
them; and no one can read them to-day but with a bleeding heart. And, as
the Christian Church grew stronger, woman's fate grew more helpless. Even
the Reformation and Protestantism brought no relief, the clergy being all
along their most bitter persecutors, the inventors of the most infernal
tortures.
Continue reading "Elizabeth Cady Stanton Critiques the Christian Church" »
Back when John McCain (R, Arizona) was running for president the first time, the Arizona Republic ran an editorial in which the paper questioned whether McCain had the right temperament for the presidency. Here's part of what was said in that editorial:
"If McCain is truly a serious contender for the presidency, it is
time the rest of the nation learned about the John McCain we know in Arizona.
There is also reason to seriously question whether he has the temperament,
and the political approach and skills, we want in the next president of the
United States."
Continue reading "McCain & Misogyny: Yikes!" »